I didnt pump any gas yesterday
nawwwwwh thats rubbish, oil companies such as BP are putting more money into finding new sources than money spent on fossel fuils. why would they want to prolong new technologies and fuels, if they don't progress with the world they will go bust, it is common sense.Originally Posted by Griever
I didnt pump any gas yesterday
If you found this post usefull then support by pressing the cute muchroom!
Wii: 7th May 2007
WiiGames: Wii Sports, Wii Play, SSX Blur, Mario Strikers!
WiiAccessories: 2xMote, 2xNunchuck
VCGames: Bomberman 93"
I wouldnt double post, but Im already in trouble for last post, so.....Originally Posted by Griever
price of gas is WAY more expensive in U.K. than America bc we have more oil resources. Been that way for a long time. no brainer. (Alaska, Texas, Gulf of Mexico, etc)
So England has "more money" than the U.S.......huh, I wasnt aware of that. Instead of running my mouth about how much I know that is bullshit, why dont you prove it to me? give me a source of reference please. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.
and who is driving around, purposely wasting gas? I mean really? Who wants to purposely waste gas when they have to pay for it? Maybe a government employee (police...etc). I know people that sell their car and say "gas was costing me too much, so I downsized"....supply and demand. Common sense.
Not that money matters so much, or that I dont have major respect for my brothers across the ocean, but I would follow Griever to the depths of hell to insult/ prove him wrong. I hate your kind. Sit there and delegate what should happen to my life, BIATCH
Last edited by Conan the Librarian; 05-16-2007 at 09:27 AM.
Not easy to do when there was an 8 minute gap between my first and second messages and a 5 minute gap between my second and third.Originally Posted by Brawny
I bought gas yesterday.
I didn't WANT to, but I also didn't want to be stranded on the side of the street, I was pretty low and didn't want to chance it.
Wow, someone is insecure about their country's identity aren't they Conan?
You clearly don't know what a communist is. If I was a communist I would be insulting you for being a capitalist but I'm not; what I am actually doing is saying you should use less carbon-based fuels. The difference between the two is so staggering that I'm surprised even someone of your (obviously) limited brain capacity can't comprehend it. Clearly, though, you lack the brain cells to comprehend the difference.First of all, Griever. You are a shit-head little communist.
It's okay; you're just suffering from a condition known as being a retard.
I think effort should be put into encouraging people to drive more ecologically friendly vehicles or, on the other hand, effort should be put into making the same vehicle more ecologically friendly by developing more eco-friendly fuels.You think effort should be put into stopping what other people drive?
You obviously don't care enough about future generations to give a shit, though, so I don't know why I am bothering differentiating between the two for you.
First of all, England is a capitalist country, so you can shove your propaganda bullshit up your arse.We run according to supply and demand. Im sure you wouldnt understand, but in my country, people start their own business and do big things with their lives. An SUV seems like a necesary tool in the construction, landscaping, remodeling business, which are all a big part of my Florida economy.
Second, I'd love for you to show me a quote where I said that "all SUV's should be scrapped" because I know you won't find one. I understand that some people need SUV's or 4x4's, people such as farmers, construction workers, etc. and so I have no problem with those people using SUV's.
I only have a problem with people who don't need them - people who live in urbanised areas and do service sector jobs where they couldn't possibly ever need such a gas-guzzling vehicle.
I suggest you learn how to read before trying to tell me what I said next time, kid.
Not quite true, although it is very possible to bend statistics. I believe bending statistics is what you did for the whole paragraph after this sentence. Congratulations on being able to criticise AND do the same thing within the same paragraph, though. Most politicians at least wait a couple of interviews before contradicting themselves.2nd, you can make a statistic say anything you want.
The easy response would be this - "No, it's a picture of me after having kicked your Dad's arse because he walked in on me rainbow kissing your mother. Oh. No. He. Didn't."3rd, is your AVI a pic of you just having busted your dads cherry?
But seriously, are silly little jokes questioning my sexuality the best you have because I've been telling jokes like that since I was 8. Try growing up sometime kid.
Again, the easy response would be - "I'm not gay, ask your mum LOLOLOL."4th, Its not your fault you are gay.
The fact is that your constant sexuality insults are lame. You sound like a homophobe who's been placed on repeat. Tell me; is it the fact that most homosexuals are more respected than you that makes you scared of them or are you just plain scared that you know you'd enjoy what they could do for you?
The funny thing is that when you say "I go to the gym 4 days a week" you make it so easy for me to do this;
And if you don't believe me just ask Mr. Maddox. Hell, this article would probably help you too!Originally Posted by Maddox AKA God
Wow, I never thought quoting Maddox would so easily win an argument. I should have thought of this sooner.
I only need two values;So England has "more money" than the U.S.......huh, I wasnt aware of that. Instead of running my mouth about how much I know that is bullshit, why dont you prove it to me? give me a source of reference please.
1) American debt is $8,822,114,586,518. That's $29,000 per person. (Source: Here)
2) British Debt is $13,781.7 per person. (Source: Here)
As you can see, the values per person are much less for the UK and because I've done it per person you can't moan about America being bigger and so it would have more debt.
But hell, even if I make the British value higher but only taking the British working population (28.5 million out of 60 million) the debt is still only $29,000 per person which is THE SAME AS THE US VALUE IS OVER EVERYONE IN THE COUNTRY INCLUDING CHILDREN!
Oh, look, I gave you a source of reference and it proved me right. You must feel like a right shit head now.
You know what, I'm done. Have fun in your mental retard classes.