LoginRegister
Nintendo Wii / Wii U Forum
Closed Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5
Results 41 to 46 of 46
  1. #41
    Gaz
    Gaz is offline
    Poker Face :D Gaz's Avatar
    Member #
    10932
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    London / Plymouth
    Posts
    887
    Friends
    0
    Wii Friend Code: $post[field5]
    2042-8451-0487-7303
    Quote Originally Posted by Griever
    the only problem is that the Oil Companies have such a monopoly over fuel that they do everything they can to restrict the use of such technology.
    nawwwwwh thats rubbish, oil companies such as BP are putting more money into finding new sources than money spent on fossel fuils. why would they want to prolong new technologies and fuels, if they don't progress with the world they will go bust, it is common sense.
    Mac Expert.

  2. #42
    Software Engineer Student Schneideren's Avatar
    Member #
    23545
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    99
    Friends
    0
    Wii Friend Code: $post[field5]
    3299-0924-7094-7534
    I didnt pump any gas yesterday
    If you found this post usefull then support by pressing the cute muchroom!
    ---
    Wii: 7th May 2007
    WiiGames: Wii Sports, Wii Play, SSX Blur, Mario Strikers!
    WiiAccessories: 2xMote, 2xNunchuck
    VCGames: Bomberman 93"

  3. #43
    Cimmerian Conan the Librarian's Avatar
    Member #
    15415
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    569
    Friends
    2
    Wii Friend Code: $post[field5]
    Quote Originally Posted by Griever
    We pay more for everything - and we still have more money than the U.S.

    Go figure ;o
    I wouldnt double post, but Im already in trouble for last post, so.....

    price of gas is WAY more expensive in U.K. than America bc we have more oil resources. Been that way for a long time. no brainer. (Alaska, Texas, Gulf of Mexico, etc)

    So England has "more money" than the U.S.......huh, I wasnt aware of that. Instead of running my mouth about how much I know that is bullshit, why dont you prove it to me? give me a source of reference please. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

    and who is driving around, purposely wasting gas? I mean really? Who wants to purposely waste gas when they have to pay for it? Maybe a government employee (police...etc). I know people that sell their car and say "gas was costing me too much, so I downsized"....supply and demand. Common sense.

    Not that money matters so much, or that I dont have major respect for my brothers across the ocean, but I would follow Griever to the depths of hell to insult/ prove him wrong. I hate your kind. Sit there and delegate what should happen to my life, BIATCH
    Last edited by Conan the Librarian; 05-16-2007 at 09:27 AM.

  4. #44
    Senior Member Skippy's Avatar
    Member #
    10574
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,191
    Friends
    0
    Wii Friend Code: $post[field5]
    Quote Originally Posted by Brawny
    Even though you quoted, using the extra 10 seconds to put them all in one post would be much appreciated by all.
    Not easy to do when there was an 8 minute gap between my first and second messages and a 5 minute gap between my second and third.

  5. #45
    WiiChat Member coleman's Avatar
    Member #
    15400
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    115
    Friends
    0
    Wii Friend Code: $post[field5]
    I bought gas yesterday.

    I didn't WANT to, but I also didn't want to be stranded on the side of the street, I was pretty low and didn't want to chance it.

  6. #46
    Banned Griever's Avatar
    Member #
    24063
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Fallowfield, Manchester
    Posts
    179
    Friends
    0
    Wii Friend Code: $post[field5]
    Wow, someone is insecure about their country's identity aren't they Conan?

    First of all, Griever. You are a shit-head little communist.
    You clearly don't know what a communist is. If I was a communist I would be insulting you for being a capitalist but I'm not; what I am actually doing is saying you should use less carbon-based fuels. The difference between the two is so staggering that I'm surprised even someone of your (obviously) limited brain capacity can't comprehend it. Clearly, though, you lack the brain cells to comprehend the difference.

    It's okay; you're just suffering from a condition known as being a retard.

    You think effort should be put into stopping what other people drive?
    I think effort should be put into encouraging people to drive more ecologically friendly vehicles or, on the other hand, effort should be put into making the same vehicle more ecologically friendly by developing more eco-friendly fuels.

    You obviously don't care enough about future generations to give a shit, though, so I don't know why I am bothering differentiating between the two for you.

    We run according to supply and demand. Im sure you wouldnt understand, but in my country, people start their own business and do big things with their lives. An SUV seems like a necesary tool in the construction, landscaping, remodeling business, which are all a big part of my Florida economy.
    First of all, England is a capitalist country, so you can shove your propaganda bullshit up your arse.

    Second, I'd love for you to show me a quote where I said that "all SUV's should be scrapped" because I know you won't find one. I understand that some people need SUV's or 4x4's, people such as farmers, construction workers, etc. and so I have no problem with those people using SUV's.

    I only have a problem with people who don't need them - people who live in urbanised areas and do service sector jobs where they couldn't possibly ever need such a gas-guzzling vehicle.

    I suggest you learn how to read before trying to tell me what I said next time, kid.

    2nd, you can make a statistic say anything you want.
    Not quite true, although it is very possible to bend statistics. I believe bending statistics is what you did for the whole paragraph after this sentence. Congratulations on being able to criticise AND do the same thing within the same paragraph, though. Most politicians at least wait a couple of interviews before contradicting themselves.

    3rd, is your AVI a pic of you just having busted your dads cherry?
    The easy response would be this - "No, it's a picture of me after having kicked your Dad's arse because he walked in on me rainbow kissing your mother. Oh. No. He. Didn't."

    But seriously, are silly little jokes questioning my sexuality the best you have because I've been telling jokes like that since I was 8. Try growing up sometime kid.

    4th, Its not your fault you are gay.
    Again, the easy response would be - "I'm not gay, ask your mum LOLOLOL."

    The fact is that your constant sexuality insults are lame. You sound like a homophobe who's been placed on repeat. Tell me; is it the fact that most homosexuals are more respected than you that makes you scared of them or are you just plain scared that you know you'd enjoy what they could do for you?

    The funny thing is that when you say "I go to the gym 4 days a week" you make it so easy for me to do this;

    Quote Originally Posted by Maddox AKA God
    You do have a point though: writing code all day is much more homoerotic than patting your jock buddies on the ass after a sweaty game of catch, then winding down with a nice, steamy, group shower. Maybe if you weren't such a sexually insecure dumbass, you'd have spent the time you pissed away playing highschool sports--you know, that thing nobody in the real world cares about--learning how to read instead so that you don't end up bagging my groceries
    And if you don't believe me just ask Mr. Maddox. Hell, this article would probably help you too!

    Wow, I never thought quoting Maddox would so easily win an argument. I should have thought of this sooner.

    So England has "more money" than the U.S.......huh, I wasnt aware of that. Instead of running my mouth about how much I know that is bullshit, why dont you prove it to me? give me a source of reference please.
    I only need two values;

    1) American debt is $8,822,114,586,518. That's $29,000 per person. (Source: Here)

    2) British Debt is $13,781.7 per person. (Source: Here)

    As you can see, the values per person are much less for the UK and because I've done it per person you can't moan about America being bigger and so it would have more debt.

    But hell, even if I make the British value higher but only taking the British working population (28.5 million out of 60 million) the debt is still only $29,000 per person which is THE SAME AS THE US VALUE IS OVER EVERYONE IN THE COUNTRY INCLUDING CHILDREN!

    Oh, look, I gave you a source of reference and it proved me right. You must feel like a right shit head now.

    You know what, I'm done. Have fun in your mental retard classes.

Closed Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts