The thread of .......................

[WiiAssasin]

Doesn't exactly make sense when your being forced to know about it their way when the purpose is recognition of the mind's unknown.

[Ads]

[Mr. MR]

recognition of the mind's unknown or understanding of the mind's unknown

[WiiAssasin]

You really expect to understand the sub con? Even I'm not bold enough to make that claim.

[Mr. MR]

To understand part of it is understanding

[WiiAssasin]

I'm not going to be the one to ruin your expectations.

[Mr. MR]

Whatcha mean?

[Splash_King]

You really expect to understand the sub con? Even I'm not bold enough to make that claim.

I would say the same. I highly doubt such forms of psychology, none the less any particular study of the brain's currently lesser-understood functions, will be accurately and wholly understood and documented for many decades to come. Which obviously extends past the time you or I will spend in college, MR.

Hopefully the next psychoanalysis genius can figure all that guff out by the time I'm dead.

[Mr. MR]

I agree we do not know everything, but we do know somethings about the sub con
after all people can manipulate it through hypnotism

[Splash_King]

Does anyone actually know someone who's been legitimately hypnotized? I ain't too trustful of the mainstream garbage I see on TV nor youtube. Particularly since I was very apprehensive towards the legitimacy of hypnotism in the past.

Also, speaking of not-so-understood brain stuff... I've heard rumors that there's recently been some sort of machine that can recreate the images someone thinks of but very hazy and distorted, though at times recognizable. This crazy Futurama-esque tech real?

[Mr. MR]

I have seen hypnotism in person
as far as I can see, it's not mainstream garbage