Alright I was going to try and not be so critical of this scale once I started reading it, who ever designed it did not have enough gameplay to be making the calls for a strategy guide.
Everyone's already mentioned the fact that these final smash ratings were all off. (Which I agree they are, seriously King Dee Dee is 7? it should be -7 for how bad it sucks ass)
But then I looked at who they ranked the best compared to the worst overall. (Marth was the best, which I thought was understandable)
Then you look at who's the worst, (the lowest over is 5)
The worst ranked: Kirby (yea i could see that), Olimar (yea he's not that great), yoshi (alright hes bad), Wario (Ok well, I think he's a little underestimated but not horrible), then Pikachu, where I finally concluded this guide is completely inaccurate and these players seriously have not been paid enough to make the calls, and if you don't think Pikachu is good, add me to brawl and I will demonstrate why.