no prob but now i noticed just a single problem with the second post.
you say that it should only be those with a stake at winning tourneys that should decide, but that itself is quite vague. i've come to a closest of 16 in the last big tourney i entered. now would you qualify that as i had a stake at winning? many would say no but a good amount would claim yes.
another thing is many would argue they do have a stake if Meta was banned. many that would lose to Meta are quite confident that they would've won if thier opponent was a different character.
so in all you arguement about only those with a stake at winning is far to vague. you yourself are arguing for specifics so i thought i'd point out how vague you were in your last post.