Super Smash Bros. 4

[Splash_King]

I actually wouldn't mind having Cloud in the game personally.

Such is the beauty of moveset hax. I couldn't possibly remember who made it, but I believe someone on KC:MM made a brilliant Cloud hack. He essentially played like an Ike that was made high tier, what a surprise.

[Ads]

[Mr. MR]

Slime has his iconic qualities and Dragon Quest is about as popular in Japan as Final Fantasy, but when you count overseas, where Dragon Quest is still quite under the radar, there's a large difference.

Umm... does it count anywhere else
They added Marth and Roy in Melee and no one overseas knew about them.

Also, Dragon Quest isn't being as focused on as Final Fantasy.

Thought we were talking about Squeenix

[RockerJ]

Thought we were talking about Squeenix

Square is responsible for Dragon Quest and Final Fantasy.

Good point on Marth and Roy, by the way.

[Mr. MR]

I just realized i read it wrong
this is how i read it "Dragon Quest is not the focus"

[WiiAssasin]

To be precise, Squeenix and Square are different entities.

[RockerJ]

I thought the difference between Square and Square Enix was when Square and Enix merged. Isn't Square good enough?

[BossFight]

Good point on Marth and Roy, by the way.

That actually is a good point, but Zelda also makes its own point. Twilight Princess sold surprisingly low in Japan, while overseas it was an enormous hit. If I remember correctly, Miyamoto said that even if Japan continued to decline as far as Zelda goes, the fact that its popularity is so great in America and Europe would keep the franchise going, despite Japan being the creators.

I believe that a Marth/Roy could be pulled again with Dragon Quest (it actually does fit in with Nintendo better) but like I said before the fact Square Enix publicizes what's already their most popular to a multiplying extent already shows us how they work. It's not a bad plan, getting something and extending its fans to such a strong extent that anything that features it will instantly be bought by rabid fans. Even I'm a victim of this: if it's got Zelda on it, you'll probably see me with it.

[WiiAssasin]

I thought the difference between Square and Square Enix was when Square and Enix merged. Isn't Square good enough?

Square=Good

Squeenix=Evil

[hybrid -x1]

Square =
Enix =

$quare €nix =

[Mr. MR]

That actually is a good point, but Zelda also makes its own point. Twilight Princess sold surprisingly low in Japan, while overseas it was an enormous hit. If I remember correctly, Miyamoto said that even if Japan continued to decline as far as Zelda goes, the fact that its popularity is so great in America and Europe would keep the franchise going, despite Japan being the creators.

I believe that a Marth/Roy could be pulled again with Dragon Quest (it actually does fit in with Nintendo better) but like I said before the fact Square Enix publicizes what's already their most popular to a multiplying extent already shows us how they work. It's not a bad plan, getting something and extending its fans to such a strong extent that anything that features it will instantly be bought by rabid fans. Even I'm a victim of this: if it's got Zelda on it, you'll probably see me with it.

Link however has perfect attendance. Even if Zelda dies (which is highly unlikely) Link would still be in Smash
Also Link is a Nintendo Icon rivaled only by Mario and Pikachu