That is exactly why I stated it was a loose analogy and not a false one. Posting completely false analogies is rather pointless. Regardless of definitions you have to think for yourself, not base your thinking on what government and law. It really doesn't matter how something is defined. If you go around spouting definitions its almost like you can't think for yourself.Originally Posted by Canumbler
Not always but in this case it is. If someone finds out how to download the VC games from Nintendo onto their Wii then Nintendo is deprived of what is taken and that is theft. Studies are just that. They only take into account the people that actually participated. They don't really prove anything or have a lot of merit. How many pirates do you know? If I know 3 and all 3 agree that they buy software that they deem worth it after being able try it out I don't have a right to say that all pirates are like that based on my study of those 3 people do I? Not at all. That's basically stereotyping in a form.