The whole yearly release bit doesn't really affect the story's quality itself, it's always been shit since they changed direction for AC:II.
Oh, the Assassins' stories of old are all fine IMO. It's how ****in' horrible they integrated the ones who came before 'n all that other precursor jazz, and to a small extent Desmond's story. It's why I tolerated; hell, enjoyed; AC1's story. No poorly presented or absurdly unnecessary bullshit. Said game shows that Assassin's Creed would've been fine, if not even better, without the precursor civilization influencing everything. Why couldn't the 2012 apocalypse simply of been Abstergo-Eye's launch? Was all this future-gazing necessary (excluding Ezio's little encounter with the Apple in Brotherhood, wasn't anythin' wrong with that)?
And on that note, I liked the Sci-fi feel AC1 offered with the animus 'n such: t'was closer to science rather than fantasy... but then AC:II and onwards ****ed all'a that up. Instead'a fitting more with the theme of regular ol' Earth with regular ol' humans, Templars and Assassins warring with blades rather than spell tomes, they had t' change the gears to cater more towards fantasy. All because'a the heavy involvement with the precursors, which is all completely unnecessary since Abstergo was enough of a plot device in the future, whereas the war between Templar and Assassin was enough in the past. All'a this unnecessary and outta place garbage is... well, unnecessary. shitty n forced exposition maeks me irate
Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag PC, Wii U , ps4 and xbox the one are coming out November 22nd
Only ps3 and xbox 360 are out now, why are ps3 and xbox 360 getting those early and but Assassin's Creed 3 released them on same date for pc, ps3, xbox, wiiu