We've been gipped: The Force Unleashed falls short

CocoSSBB · 04-14-2008, 01:01 AM

I'm sorry I even posted here before, as this place is turning into a war zone.

I will leave for a tranquil game of GRAW 2.

metalfreak · 04-14-2008, 01:48 AM

another reason to buy the Wii version:

YOU GET TO PLAY MORE AS VADER!!!

while the ps3/360 only hav vader for the opening lvls wii gets many more levels! (from newest GI issue (May))

not to mention lightsaber duels some motion based force controls...i think i mightve wet myself :0

Atomheart · 04-14-2008, 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nihilism

It has to do with the consumer because it is the consumer who says what comes out on top. If the consumer wants to play GTA IV, they can go out and buy either the 360 or the PS3. If the consumer wants to play Brawl, the only option is to buy a Wii. Nintendo's profits aren't threatened by another company having the same games as them. Furthermore, plenty of third party developers are making, and are going to continue to be making, Wii exclusive games because of the control scheme possibilities.

And? Console profits means absolutely nothing to the consumer. To the consumer all that matters are the number of quality games that are available for a console. The reality is that the 360 (and the PS3 to a lesser degree) has FAR more quality games than the Wii. Period. Who cares if the games are exclusive or if they're shared by both the PS3 and the 360 (I can assure you that the consumer doesn't).

gpoleweski · 04-14-2008, 02:09 AM

Please just stop, it's been going back and forth for a page and a half now with no real moving forward in the argument. And this is off topic.

Dorkfish · 04-14-2008, 02:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wii-Fi

so if you played battlefront or any other starwars game you'll probably remember that you never use force powers anyway. It was a good review you just posted a part of it too make it look like crap.

Battlefront II had force powers while playing as hero guys. I had an ownage combo in it, too. *Force Pull-caaaaaaaaaaaarve

AutumnWind · 04-14-2008, 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by linuxghost

1.) Even if there were minor, forgiveable reasons for me not wanting to play another highly-rated game, at least those games are ON THE MOTHER****ING MARKET. This game isn't even out yet and you've already said you have no desire to play it. THAT. IS. STUPID.

2.) You can claim you're taking the high road all you want, you've called me a "moron" a number of times as well. Ignorance is bliss, I guess?

3.) I don't even know, or care, what your "slander argument" is. And don't bother explaining it; I truly couldn't possibly give a shit less.

lawl okay, seeing your asinine responses, none of which address anything in a reasonable or logical manner, I can safely confirm that you are simply what you spew: bullshit. I'm sure it's perfectly reasonable for people as consumers to decide, for themselves, based on their views and needs, whether something on the market or something that's coming to the market is going to be worth their time. In this case, I and a few others have decided, based on knowledge that we all have (info on control schemes) that we aren't going to be interested. If you've ever studied basic economics, you'll learn that everyone does this. If a good satisfies a need/want, then people will buy it. In this case, the product is not satisfactory in these aspects and thus, the people whose requirements it doesn't fulfill will not be buying it. The fact that you generalize this into 'moronic', when it's something everyone does, something that's entirely logical, just makes you the ignorant one here. Again, just because you've admitted to blindly purchasing things that you don't need, still doesn't mean that people who don't buy things they don't need idiotic. If you seriously think swearing, typing in caps, and claiming you 'dont give a shit' while blaming others for 'ignorance' is making you any less of a moron, I have nothing to say. =P Have a nice day sir.