Separate names with a comma.
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.
Discussion in 'Nintendo Wii Gaming' started by Lethal, Dec 1, 2006.
Top is in HD bottom is standard res.
wow.. if the wii didn't have the wii-mote, i would never buy it.. the graphics on the other two systems are amazing. ps3 does a lot better with dark colours too.
Hmmmm I thought the 360 version looked the best out of the 3.
I think PS3 won. Better lighting maybe
I think with the wii they could have done better with the graphics. When you look at Resident Evil 4 on the gamecube it looks better then cod3 (wii version). The wii has twice the power as the gamecube.
It's all about the programmers taking the time to perfect the graphics to the machine. Sadly, most don't.
I suspect (and hope) that the development environment for the Wii was not ready for primetime at the point when the developers of the launch titles needed it. Instead, they would have used a gamecube dev system and port it over in a short timeframe to meet the launch. This would somewhat help explain the severe lack of graphical quality seen so far and be somewhat excusable... COD has other issues, though, than just development environments... Keep in mind that though the graphics in RE4 are really quite good on the gamecube, there isn't much movement within the game and therefore not a high demand is placed on the cpu/gpu for "moving objects". COD has *so* much more going on that it isn't a fair comparison. All the movement has to be tracked, polygons redrawn, textures filled-in, etc. That eats cpu/gpu cycles like crazy.
Though I'm quite disappointed with the Wii's graphics so far, I've decided to wait until the next generation of titles to be released before I pass my final judgment on whether or not to buy a Wii. In the end, though, I am fairly convinced that the graphics are going to be a mighty sore spot for a lot of current and possible Wii owners going forward. We'll see...
^ He's right. But honestly, if Nintendo would stop being retarded and allow online play for a bunch of games, graphics would mean nothing to me. As of now, though, I'm just angry at Nintendo so the graphics are making me angry as well because they are no better than the Gamecube's so far.
But as for the comparison video, 360 looks the best to me.
its not all about gfx..when r u lil kids gonna realize this..
It is for a lot of people. Graphics are extremely important.
Ps3 get's the win for colors
360 for lighting
Wii get's a half a cookie for trying... I think they tried, right?
the controls for the game suck on the wii. i pretty much have to be point blank to shoot a guy instinctively with the wiimote. otherwise, i have to take some time to line up the shot. i might be bad at the game, but i'm not THAT bad. also, the gameplay is far too linear and there is no multiplayer. i should not have bought the game.
I am hearing this more and more. Very glad I bought Rayman over this and now I am going to buy NFS:Carbon over it again. I am waiting for FarCry to get my Wii FPS filler.
The Wii's graphics definately could be better than COD3. This is pretty much a PS2 port. I think games could become better quality than Red Steel aswell. The majority of new titles are ports from ex-GCN and PS2 games. All of this is good because all of the PS3 footage I have seen have been of the system running overtime, I mean, sure Tony Hawk's looks nice on PS3, but its running at 10FPS (occasionally less), showing that the PS3 is being pushed to the max (60FPS should be standard). Whereas Wii titles run pretty damn smooth. I think we are yet to see the Wii being pushed to the max...
The gameplay looked like it should surpass the other versions. The graphics were what i consider good, not fantastic though.
Personally, I hate world war 2 games by this point. have people nt gotten their damn fill by now?!!!! and speaking of the graphics for wii, has any one seen the graphics for supersmash bros?!! they look friggin SWEET. These are all launch titles people, let remember that. I think nintendo was focusing more on quantity than quality this time around simply so they could have more titles to choos from, as well as more available units by launch date. I think we are going to see the true potential once all the goodgames come out. think about it, since when has a nintendo system EVER launched with out a mario game? this is the first time in HISTORY that a nintendo system has come out with only one of its classic titles available on launch day (Legend of Zelda). What about mario cart? Metroid? Donkey Kong? the **** is gona hit the fan and I think nintendo is just holding back the big guns for when the war starts to heat up dudes.
The Wii CoD3 isnt a bad game. If you compare graphics to all 3 systems Wii is going to loose almost every time. It's got its fun moments, but it's just a rental game.
360 looked the bets out the three, the playstation just made evry thing look really light and pale.
To be honest, theres not THAT much of a difference between the three, who cares!? I personally wouldnt care if the wii was like the flippin' gamecube, i just love the concept of the wiimote.
since when has a nintendo system EVER launched with out a mario game?
GameCube didnt came out with a Mario game, it came out with Luigi's Mansion. Mario Sunshine came later.
And it may be my eyes, but it's not a so big difference between the three... and the wii looks much more fun to play
Ummmm there is a HUGE difference between the PS3/XBox and Wii. And the Wii looks terrible ...360 looks a BIT better than the PS3, and the PS3 looks too bright, and actually LESS atmosphere.