Separate names with a comma.
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.
Discussion in 'Nintendo Gamecube' started by SpawnKiller, Jun 24, 2007.
i say Fox is better because he is faster then Falco.
Fox all the way Spawn!!! ATW!
falco ( i cant belive i didn't see this thread ) because he's stronger and attacks arent like light but powerfull and still pretty fast
Neither. Both are evenly match. Fox's shine/reflector can kill Falco with one hit near the edge. Falco can combo the crap out of Fox. Proof in this match http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_m3gitYccuY
im glad Nintendo didnt sell Fox McLould with Banjo to Microsoft
I WANT "RARE" BACK nintendos old company
they made classics
Conkers bad fury day
I'm a Fox fan also so i have to go with fox.
i think falco is faster and has better C stick moves. But both characters are so over-rated
I'm not really sure since I'm awful at this game to begin with but my preference over all others has always been Fox.
Err i am going to say, Falco. Falco can kick the grandkids out of fox. Although both are so highly over rated. it really does not make a difference. Choose another character or bust.
both good but I say falco
Exactly my point. From what I've seen in actual matches between pros, and ofcourse, tier lists, Melee Fox and Falco have a nuetral match-up. But, I'll leave it to Dorkfish to find this thread and prove it himself.
Overrated?! Nonono. Fox and Falco are both more-than-viable Top Tier fighters in melee. Overused, like the other Top Tiers, yes. But overrated? No.
For sake of being a Brawl fanboy that I am... Fox is effectively, middle tier in Brawl. Falco is Top. Who's better now? ;D Fox can go Do A Barrel Roll! off the stage.
Hahaha quiet A long response for falco