Sonic Games you think should be made!!!
- Thread starter daisyJ27
- Start date
What are you?
The ill-informed gamer?
When you don't know what your talking about its best not to say anything at all
A fighting game would be nice
But there would be one major down fall
Sega have made one of the best most in-depth fighting games ever (Virtua Fighter 5) and Nintendo have only made Smash brothers witch is hard to call a traditional fighting game
Sega games have been on none Sega consoles before (back before there first home console)
But then so have Nintendos games
But then so have Nintendos games
Bodine
Sonic expert
- Jan 25, 2009
- 2,366
- 2
- Wii Online Code
- 1234-1234-1234-1234
Wow, epic fail to the most epic level. Anybody and everybody who played video games in the 90's just did a major facepalm when they read this, and anybody who knows at least a little about game companys and liscensing.
daisyJ27 said:
Yeah... and so has Capcom, Konami, Namco, ect. Are you saying Nintendo owns them too? Any game for a Nintendo console not created by Nintendo must be liscensed under them. It's sort of, you know, A LAW. Same as how any game for a PlayStation console not created from Sony must be liscensed under Sony, and must be liscensed under Microsoft for Xbox/Xbox 360.... People these days. -_-
There are a few none licensed by Nintendo games out on the NES/SNES
Super Noah's Ark 3D springs to mind.
The Angry Video game nerd did some reviews on them where he explains all
There not exactly illegal (or good) but Nintendo didnt want them out
There are also homebrew games
Bodine
Sonic expert
- Jan 25, 2009
- 2,366
- 2
- Wii Online Code
- 1234-1234-1234-1234
Why Nintendo? They don't make the games for Sega.
How are they alive again thanks to Nintendo?
facepalm.jpeg
