Welcome to Our Community

Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.

Make Risk-Takers Pay?

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by Brawny, Jun 11, 2009.

  1. Brawny

    Brawny Anglophobiphile

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2006
    Messages:
    6,522
    Likes Received:
    129
    Location:
    Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    Wii Friend Code: 5385-4035-7079-0395
    5385-4035-7079-0395
    "Thrill-seekers hoping to surf the most difficult ocean wave, to bushwhack through treacherous back-country terrain or to catch the biggest ice-water fish sometimes take unnecessary risks, disregarding weather forecasts or warning signs. If they need to be rescued, let's bill them for the cost of the rescue"

    I've already said it before about people who do motorcycle attempts and have 5 ambulances waiting for them. What happens if someone else needs an ambulance for a reason that isn't their fault, and they can't get one in time?

    Also, a small county in West Virginia is a thrill-seeker's paradise very popular for hang gliding and rock climbing, and the people who live there have to pay for the helicopter rescue fees that people from out of state need when they get stuck. It costs about $4000 per rescue.

    As it stands now, those risk-takers don't need to pay for rescues, should that change?
     

Share This Page