PS3 sucks, now tell me why not to think so.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Shiftfallout said:
See those are your tastes, but not everyone elses. I dont know about everyone else, but I dont enjoy playing the role of a small boy, nor do I enjoy seeing some of my favorite FF characters in the same world with Bambie and Goofy. (I am speaking from experience by the way, i have played them or tried to rather)
I wasn't talking about tastes with my previous post, I was saying that it was so overly discriptive that it read as a personal critique rather than as a decent evaluation of the game.

Its like your favorite porn star, you might want to see her in as much vidoes as possible, untill you finally pick the one where they mix animals into it. Then it just becomes tasteless. Thats how I feel about kingdom hearts.
Speak for yourself on the porn aspect. However, I do see what you're saying, although I disagree that Kingdom Hearts could share an analogy with beastiality. For a start, beastiality reduces the market (fewer people wanting to see it than regular porn), whilst Kingdom Hearts expands on it.

As for the game play, its not all that amazing. Its basically a hack and slash action game with some strategy involved. It cant really be compared to FF.
Didn't say amazing, I said pretty good. And I stand by it. The gameplay has few flaws, even for a button basher. It's not all there is to it, but it is one of the fun aspects. And in regards to the FF bit, which FF were you thinking of? I found that the active time battle system of FF12 wasn't all that great. Would have prefered the turn based machanics.

The strongest feature found in KH is the story, this is not un-expected though considering who made it. It can be a good story, but that doesnt change the fact that it is appealing to everyone.
Is there anything wrong with appealing to everyone?

I personally think it was a bad move to intermix Final Fanstasy and Disney, but thats their secreting marketing plan. They made it because it would appeal to a large fanbase by mixing the characters, it works and their tactics are a tad obvious.
A tad obvious? I should think so really. Although, taking the instantly recongisability of Disney franchises and putting them with Final Fantasy Characters is a good move for Square Enix, as it can be said to be an opening into the Final Fantasy games.

Usually it would have been bought out as an exclusive if the budget was not high, especially for a square enix game. The budget is high, disney will want a large share of money from the use of the characters, they want it to make a profit. A lot of people have to get paid out from this game, and thus more accessable market means reaching their goal. It might or might not happen.
Hence the "(although in this case it would probably be)". There is still a slim chance it will be out as an exclusive, but to be fair, I doubt the existing Sony fanbase would really appreciate it as much as Wii players.
 
Squall7 said:
I wasn't talking about tastes with my previous post, I was saying that it was so overly discriptive that it read as a personal critique rather than as a decent evaluation of the game.
Relax, im not jumping on your case. Just expanding on how i feel.

Speak for yourself on the porn aspect. However, I do see what you're saying, although I disagree that Kingdom Hearts could share an analogy with beastiality. For a start, beastiality reduces the market (fewer people wanting to see it than regular porn), whilst Kingdom Hearts expands on it.
It shares the analogy perfectly in my opinion. A lot of people like animals, and a lot of people like porn. Mix them together and it doesnt really appeal to everyone.
This works the same, alot of people like the FF characters, alot of people like Disney characters... mix them together and it doesnt really appeal to everyone.


Didn't say amazing, I said pretty good. And I stand by it. The gameplay has few flaws, even for a button basher. It's not all there is to it, but it is one of the fun aspects. And in regards to the FF bit, which FF were you thinking of? I found that the active time battle system of FF12 wasn't all that great. Would have prefered the turn based machanics.
amazing or pretty good.. whats the difference, its all subjective anyhow.

I was talking about the real FF stuff, i didnt bother touching FF12. I prefer turnbased myself for the FF series. I believe the original KH came out before FF12, so it seems that FF12 shares more with HK than it does with the original FF games.

Is there anything wrong with appealing to everyone?
Nope. But its also kind of obvious what they were trying to do. Do you like pepsi? do you like Sprite? now you can have the best of both worlds.. now watch as we mix them together and call our new product... spripsi.
It will alienate some though.

A tad obvious? I should think so really. Although, taking the instantly recongisability of Disney franchises and putting them with Final Fantasy Characters is a good move for Square Enix, as it can be said to be an opening into the Final Fantasy games.

Spripsi!!! Its a matter of opinion really. Though they did make a bit of profit.


Hence the "(although in this case it would probably be)". There is still a slim chance it will be out as an exclusive, but to be fair, I doubt the existing Sony fanbase would really appreciate it as much as Wii players.

Considering the target audience, you are probably correct. It reminds me of that commercial where they say "hey give it to mikey, he will eat anything" and mikey nods his head and goes "yum". Also mikey was what.. 4 years old.
 
Last edited:
I did prefer turnbased... I was quite annoyed with the ATB system at the start of FF12, but it is seriously one of the best Final Fantasy games. Perfect gameplay and story to me :)
 
Shiftfallout said:
Relax, im not jumping on your case. Just expanding on how i feel.
Fair enough.

It shares the analogy perfectly in my opinion. A lot of people like animals, and a lot of people like porn. Mix them together and it doesnt really appeal to everyone.
People like Mice, dogs and ducks, but that doesn't constitute as half of the animals out there. Also, not everyone likes animals or porn, so if you're going to put them together then it wouldn't appeal to everyone. Putting together 2 non-extremes does not always get you an extreme.

This works the same, alot of people like the FF characters, alot of people like Disney characters... mix them together and it doesnt really appeal to everyone.
Seperately, they didn't appeal to everyone. However, if you take the worst bits from each you'll end up with a bad product. If you take the best bits of each (which is what they tried to do) then you'll make a good product.

amazing or pretty good.. whats the difference, its all subjective anyhow.
If you just found a fiver in your wallet that you forgot you had, that's pretty good. However, it wouldn't be amazing. Although I do see your point, I think pretty good does describe the battle system. Better battle system in the second one however.

I was talking about the real FF stuff, i didnt bother touching FF12. I prefer turnbased myself for the FF series. I believe the original KH came out before FF12, so it seems that FF12 shares more with HK than it does with the original FF games.
Battle system wise, yes. Storyline wise, it doesn't really fit with either, more of a post-colonial critique with Fantasy Elements (FF12 that is). I gotta admit, overall, I prefered the CTB system from Final Fantasy X. Makes the battles more tactical and you can really take time over thinking about how you're going to progress.

Nope. But its also kind of obvious what they were trying to do. Do you like pepsi? do you like Sprite? now you can have the best of both worlds.. now watch as we mix them together and call our new product... spripsi.
It will alienate some though.
Yes, but that doesn't always happen. You like Coca Cola? You like Lemon? Put them together, and it does sell pretty well. (Although now you've said that, I think I might try Spripsi. Sounds like some sort of drink used in a psychic game like Second Sight or Psi ops.)

Spripsi!!! Its a matter of opinion really. Though they did make a bit of profit.
All products are ultimately designed to make profit. It just depends on how much and where that profit goes to...

Considering the target audience, you are probably correct. It reminds me of that commercial where they say "hey give it to mikey, he will eat anything" and mikey nods his head and goes "yum". Also mikey was what.. 4 years old.
That isn't really the case this time though. Lots of Wii players will not go near the PS3 or 360, so it isn't a case of having anything and everything. The ages on this forum range from 13 - 30's. I don't think the 4 years old bit was really relevant.
 
Robertking1123 said:
if the wii and ps3 were women, which one would you want then?

this is funny. fanboys will be all over this but i just thought it was funny. remeber those mac and pc commercials? here is the wii and ps3 with the same format. funny ****.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljZOHnZNaBc&mode=related&search=

I dont even have to click it to know what it is. Its just as retarded as the Mac vs PC commercials since we all know how accurate those are... sigh.

by the way, thats old.
 
Wiitendo said:
Blu-ray sucks. Get the equal if not better HD and much cheaper. Oh and games? from where? this "home" another rip off the miis is the only thing sony can make and thats some of it too. All sony had was KH which is comming to xbox and wii. Motion sencoing stole from the wii and used patheticly. Wii gose online MUCH MUCH easier. Your purple **** 3 is no good, rachet and clank is said to be out for wii. Sony's only hope for 3 party franchise is dead. Its too expensive and no fun.


-Oh no i take that back, blu-ray is good for movies like high school musical and the lion king. No action-packed or comody or ANY good movies would come out for the blu-ray, even if it dose 10 months after its on HD DVD/DVD


RATCHET AND CLANK for WII??? PLEASE show me sources thats too good to be true.........( I LOVE THE SERIES!) oh and ps3 sucks lol GO WII!!!!
WHY??
videogames are about GAMEPLAY
and i think in by fall of this year wii will have way better games then ps3
 
gh05t said:
videogames are about GAMEPLAY

True, but there are many other factors that make up a god console such as graphics, hardrive, creativity, fun factor ext...

But I understand what you're saying, gamplay is a big factor.
 
Shiftfallout said:
I dont even have to click it to know what it is. Its just as retarded as the Mac vs PC commercials since we all know how accurate those are... sigh.

by the way, thats old.

i dont recall sayin, "Shiftfallout You gotta see this." I swear I said i thought it was funny. i didnt not say it was accurate. Im starting to think you are a ps3 fanboy. i wonder if it was one that was saying the ps3 was better it would be funny to you. It was made on G4 so we already know its a parody.
as far as the mac and pc commercials its an apple commercial of course they will make themselves look better.

thats like pepsi making a commercial about coke like they are gonna say well if you are really thirsty you cant really taste the diffrence. nope who ever is paying for the commercial is gonna be the better one

oh yea, all so just cause you seen it "eons" ago makes it old to you. I never seen it till I seen it. which makes it new to me.
that is just like family guy on fox and adult swim. you would see a new episode on fox b4 you would see it on adult swim but if you missed the fox airing you could still see it on adult swim and it would be new to the person seeing it for the first time.:yikes:
 
Robertking1123 said:
i dont recall sayin, "Shiftfallout You gotta see this." I swear I said i thought it was funny. i didnt not say it was accurate. Im starting to think you are a ps3 fanboy. i wonder if it was one that was saying the ps3 was better it would be funny to you. It was made on G4 so we already know its a parody.
as far as the mac and pc commercials its an apple commercial of course they will make themselves look better.

thats like pepsi making a commercial about coke like they are gonna say well if you are really thirsty you cant really taste the diffrence. nope who ever is paying for the commercial is gonna be the better one

oh yea, all so just cause you seen it "eons" ago makes it old to you. I never seen it till I seen it. which makes it new to me.
that is just like family guy on fox and adult swim. you would see a new episode on fox b4 you would see it on adult swim but if you missed the fox airing you could still see it on adult swim and it would be new to the person seeing it for the first time.:yikes:

no need to get emotional about it. my post was only stating a couple of facts. That its old and that its like those mac vs pc commercials. You are putting meaning where none was stated. R-E-L-A-X =)
 
Why do you always think people get emotional about your posts? Sorry but you are a bit full of yourself.
 
Celestial said:
Why do you always think people get emotional about your posts? Sorry but you are a bit full of yourself.

when this "I dont even have to click it to know what it is. Its just as retarded as the Mac vs PC commercials since we all know how accurate those are... sigh.
by the way, thats old."


is responded by his "i dont recall sayin, "Shiftfallout You gotta see this." I swear I said i thought it was funny. i didnt not say it was accurate. Im starting to think you are a ps3 fanboy. i wonder if it was one that was saying the ps3 was better it would be funny to you. It was made on G4 so we already know its a parody.
as far as the mac and pc commercials its an apple commercial of course they will make themselves look better.

thats like pepsi making a commercial about coke like they are gonna say well if you are really thirsty you cant really taste the diffrence. nope who ever is paying for the commercial is gonna be the better one

oh yea, all so just cause you seen it "eons" ago makes it old to you. I never seen it till I seen it. which makes it new to me.
that is just like family guy on fox and adult swim. you would see a new episode on fox b4 you would see it on adult swim but if you missed the fox airing you could still see it on adult swim and it would be new to the person seeing it for the first time."

I would say thats reacting a bit emotional, considering i wasnt even getting on his case. Just commenting on the video in a thread titled: "ps3 sucks now tell me why not to think so".

Geeze celes once someone states they were not that thrilled about Kingdom hearts you get all bent of shape. No need to hate. But hey, if you need to relieve some stress, keep it up.
 
How did I get all bent out of shape when someone didn't like Kingdom Hearts? Aren't you the one that wouldn't shutup when people insulted the Ps3?
 
Shiftfallout said:
no need to get emotional about it. my post was only stating a couple of facts. That its old and that its like those mac vs pc commercials. You are putting meaning where none was stated. R-E-L-A-X =)

im fine. why is it when i go into explination about why i think about something its being emotional? but when you do it its stating facts. :frown2: what you said was not facts.

calling pc and mac commercials retarded just cause you like the pc? not factual.

you sayin something is old was only a half fact. it was indeed old to you since you seen it. the day i seen it, it was new. but not only that i never said look at this brand new clip.

:idea: i notice that if some one says ps3 is crap or it stole from nintendo. you write a full novel. does that mean you are getting emotinal for a piece of hardware?:nono: when i make a reply to one of your post, im being emotional?

ummmm no. just like you i like to state my opinion about things supported with fact. facts dont always make things right anyway.

look at this,
its a fact that you can overdose on drugs.
its a fact that weed is illegal.
its a fact that weed is a drug

in my opinion in order for something to be a drug you have to mix some chemicals to make it. legal or illegal. ie perscription, over the counter, or meth.

in my opinon i never heard of anyone smoking smoking into a overdose so weed isnt a drug and should be legal.

now even though the facts are true (to a point) i have some good opinions as well. they also make the facts seem a lil shaky. but due to laws no matter how right i think it should be will say no to weed. but take 12 tylenol and that will be your last headache (lmao @ katt williams)

some things are facts others are just very strong opinions
i mean hell years ago it was a "fact" that the earth was flat.:eek:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top