SOTW #11 Applications

[Gymdawg]

It's only Softporn,
I think it's fine, Though if you want him to make another...

He'll make another if he wants to enter bad enough.

 

[Syntax]

I believe its fine aswell. Reason being that you see more explicit stuff in some tv commercials along with magazine ads. Also if most of the people have already seen the sig I see no harm in it. Oh and no moderator has told him to remove it or make a new one yet so its fine. Also have you not seen Jill's signature? Hers is of a woman wearing a bra lying ontop of a gun. Sorry but I see no problem with it other than the fact that you alone seem to be offended by it.

 

[ssbb_lover]

Maybe i'm just being ignorant, but I just now noticed Gym switched back to his original avvy (one of my favorite avs of all time).

I don't think there's any problem with the sig tbh. Like Syntax said, no mods have told him to change it, so it's obviously not "too explicit". You may think so personally (I do :/ ), but to be fair, I don't think there's a problem.

 

[Gymdawg]

Oh and no moderator has told him to remove it or make a new one yet so its fine.

It's only been up a day.

Also have you not seen Jill's signature? Hers is of a woman wearing a bra lying ontop of a gun.

A black bra, for starters, and the quality of that picture is substantially lower. Almo's shows a thong and a transparent top that almost reveals nipple; both in high quality.

Sorry but I see no problem with it other than the fact that you alone seem to be offended by it.

I'm not offended by it, but it's not suitable for this site. The way I see it, if the other members are to immature for intelligent discussions about philosophy and religion then they're sure as hell to immature for things like this, even if it's "only softporn"...

 

[Syntax]

Try also taking a look at Star Striker's avatar.

Seeing as no mod has made a big deal over it I believe its still fine. Also if you were to turn on the tv most of the ads you will see will feature half naked people supporting some kind of soap, bathing material, summer clothes (people in bikini's etc), and so on. Now I'm not saying I support these style of signatures and avatars but if the mods have no problem with both Jill and Star Striker's avatar then I find no problem with Almo's.

 

[Gymdawg]

If no MOD or i0n says anything about it then it'll be allowed. I suppose I won't really have a choice.

 

[ssbb_lover]

If no MOD or i0n says anything about it then it'll be allowed. I suppose I won't really have a choice.

Lmao, seems that way. We'll let the Wiichat Staff sort it out. It'll be counted as an entry until the Staff turns it down.

 

[Wii_Smurf]

Lmao, seems that way. We'll let the Wiichat Staff sort it out. It'll be counted as an entry until the Staff turns it down.

You seem so sure they will?
I might make one, I dunno

 

[ssbb_lover]

You seem so sure they will?
I might make one, I dunno

No. I'm not sure. I'm just saying if they take it out, then it won't be counted as an entry and vice versa. That's all.

 

[Almo]

lol man the controversy ive caused... seriously this is nothing that you cannot see already on TV, and assuming you are on the internet to post here everyone already has the potential of viewing softcore anyway, 65% of pop ups are this kinda stuff, ive sent you a PM and like i said im sorry if its offencive but seriously people in todays society sex is advertising. I will happily remove the sig from being used as my personal sig but i do not believe it should be removed from the competition just because SOME younger wiichat viewers are immature. Also im sorry to my desensitizeation as i live in NZ and rules over here on all sorts of things are alot looser than the US and UK.

 

[The_Loose_Cannon]

this is the EXACT PM i wrote to almo and what he wrote me:

hey jill sorry but Gymdawg is giving me alotta grief over this, My entry to SOTW this week is a bacardi sig that i made which contains some "offencive and innapropriate" content, i do not believe this is so and ive sent him both a PM and posted my view, can you please take a look at this sig and notify me as wether it should be removed or not, if there is no problem can you please post in the SOTW #11 thread notifing members of its allowance into the competition.
Thanks heaps
Al :wink:

yeah i saw that sig. i was actually going to do a thread in site feedback that i started a inappropriate sig/avatar trend. TBH im to blame for that since my avatars havent been very rated G around here (first my own chest with my gun and now this glock picture)

i can see where gymdawg would be a bit conservative and "reject" your entry. he feels that probably due to the "sexual" nature that kids would vote for it due to "boobs" or "girls" not because its talented. see where i am comming from?

im not putting you down at all hun so dont take it as if im siding with anyone. me personally i dont think its inappropriate because look at mine. its a girl in a bathingsuite top photoshoped laying on a gun.......im in no possition to say if its good or not. but like i said i personally dont mind. youre old enough to know if youre setting a good example with those types of innuendos.

it DOES promote drinking and girls though but then agian look at me, guns and girls.

either way, dont take it to heart. if you feel that alot of people are approaching you to "get rid of it" then id do it. if not then leave it be.

unless instructed by a fellow mod (stoukaph actually told me i was a bit risque in the pic but i didnt listen lol) then get rid of it. if youre getting heat about it, get rid of it. in the mean time if its only gymdawg then just leave it be.

dont start a fight about it, its not worth it. ya know?

chin up

 

[Almo]

thanks TLC, also as you guys may have noticed I have remove it sig from my signature so if offensive it will only effect users who veiw this thread and not the entire forum.

 

[The_Loose_Cannon]

thanks TLC, also as you guys may have noticed I have remove it sig from my signature so if offensive it will only effect users who veiw this thread and not the entire forum.

anytime.

in defense, i honestly dont have a problem with any of that. ME though, im not talking on behalf of all the others BUT like i wrote stou has approached me because some member wrote a "report" that my avatar was unacceptable and too sexual for the site. he told me to read the report that i got in my emails and i said "F-it, im not changing it" so i didnt he said OK and that was the end of it.

i made a thread a LONG time ago too about my original avatar and no one said otherwise. so why bother.

as long as it doesnt show EVERYTHING who cares. if its sexual enough to use your imagination then so be it. look at prinny

gymdawg i thank you for voicing your opinion that you didnt think it was appropriate.

lets all go forward from this and learn that thats just ONE step "too far" ok? we know we can push the envelope but not that far ok?

"here endeth the lesson" <-- name that movie!!

 

[ssbb_lover]

I don't mean to butt in...but, uhh...

This is SOTW #11 Application. -_-

 

[The_Loose_Cannon]

I don't mean to butt in...but, uhh...

This is SOTW #11 Application. -_-

im gunna kick your ass mr "i gave you your second green bar and didnt even thank me for it"!!!!

now like p diddy says "vote or die"

:ciappa: