If you're referring to the nonexistent "sense of a main story" part, I sorta see where you're coming from but I fail to see why it's a big deal. But if that's not what you're referring to I'm rather confused since there's been a (pointless) official timeline for a while now.The devs' need to confirm that half-assed timeline in order to validate the theory-crafting of fans is the biggest threat to the Zelda franchise thus far. From now on, if they ever decide to make a Zelda with a srs story, it'd have to kiss up to that stupid timeline by pulling the most cringe-worthy of literary devices.
I know a guy who complains when Mario Kart "breaks the Mario canon", lol. Because everyone knows that the Mario canon is equally, no, more important than every other canon.Its a Nintendo game.
Time lines are as irrelevant than they are in Street fighter as they dont give a toss
Imagen if Mario had one
That said, there are some Ninty series were the timeline does matter...Mother and Metroid are the only ones that come to mind, with the former not exactly being a "big" series. And the timeline matters with a few things in Zelda, such as the flood and the events of Majoras Mask, but it's mostly pointless. Ganon being revived again happens, uh, occasionally.