Photography Thread

  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #18
If you have 6.50 that you don't mind dropping on it, then I would say go for it.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #20
Here's a shot of the mustang, I like it so chyea.

Had to lower the resolution to 120 so it wouldn't be enormous.

065a.jpg


Taken with the Nikon, F of 4.6, Shutter speed of 1/60, not sure on the ISO.
 
Man that's a really good picture, great camera.

Speaking of cameraaaas, mine finally arrived today XD
Well, it got delivered y/day or the day before, but I wasn't in, so picked it up from the PO earlier. The Canons out of battery so I had to take a picture of it using my webcam lawl. A replica Leica, beauuuuutiful =]

IMG000069.jpg
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #22
Very nice, what did that run ya? Also do you know what the actual Leica would cost? I justa curious.
 
That only cost me £40.
Still haven't got the chance to use it =/

And original Leicas can range from around £200 for an M2 body, up to about £4,000 for a mint condition boxed with lenses. Which is why I settled for a replica =P
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #24
Another shot I took actually earlier today. Once again scaled down from it's original size.

DSCN5651-1.jpg


It was for an assignment, 20 images with the same object as the focal.
 
That's quite an interesting setup. Very good use of focal distance and the such. Top marks I presume ;)

How have I not posted in this thread till now? No idea. I'll get a photo of my camera gear up soonish.
 
Nice shots BlueOvalBoy.

Heres some camera porn:

3216470183_95079ba6ff_b.jpg


Canon 24-105L ... SIGMA 8mm FISHEYE ... CANON 450D ... 580EX II Speedlite

And heres what that 8mm Fisheye can do:
3271548029_dcf22f971f_b.jpg


And for band photography, unfortunately out of focus, was taken an hr after I got the lens:
3271563339_ec32b9be2c_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #27
I like the fisheye, pretty sweet results. How do you like the camera, from what I read it sounds like it has quite a few useful features.
 
Haha....the camera honestly....really is quite budget. But I mean as an entry-level camera, its pretty damn good for the price.

I dont like the Nikon interface, and apparently their lenses are on average more expensive, so being the student that I am, I opted for the easier to use, cheaper option.

Oddly...my 8mm SIGMA is marginally sharper than my 24-105, which shouldnt be right...

(If you are thinking of going digital SLR, there really are only 2 choices: Nikon or Canon. Both brands have so many lenses and accessories to choose from, you cant go wrong).
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #29
For a "budget" camera it seems like it takes some pretty damn good photos. I've been contemplating between the Canons and Nikons for when I finally can afford a DSLR and since I've been using a Nikon I'm used to it's interface, but then again I know you can't go wrong with Canon. It's just finding a model that isn't too pricey and that is going to have the features I need/want. I've been looking at the XSi and XTi Canons and the D90 and D80 Nikons.
 
You know what can take good photos? An Minolta XE-1

Yeaaah, that's my camera.
 
Back
Top