Ronan
WiiChat Member
Put WMD's near him but so he cant reach them lol!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Darkprinny said:In before Marisa defending him
Ezekiel86 said:Reading through the heckled and jeering responses of so many of you make me really wonder who is worse... Saddam was bad, but like Nate said, if you punish a murderer with murder, you're just as bad.
I know what he has done is inexcusible, but let's not forget he's not the only player involved in this. Afterall, who gave him the facilities to execute his genocidal attacks? The USA of course. Let's not forget he is being charged for the deaths of 130 people (apparently the court did not take into account the figures from the 70's and 80's as cited by DragonWii). This is approximately the figure of Iraqi civilians being murdered every day by the US-led coalition in Iraq, but will you see any of their leaders go on trial for crimes against humanity? I highly doubt it.
The kind of people who are quick to bag Saddam are usually the same kind who hate Hitler for no apparent reason other than the fact everybody else seems to hate him. The point I am trying to make is that no-one has the right to critisize Hitler or Saddam any more than George Bush or Ehud Olmert, as nothing they are doing are anything short of what the Nazis did leading up to World War II. Infact the between the Saddam/Hitler scenario and the Bush scenario is that Saddam and Hitler knew how to manage their economies, and they countries were economically very prosperous during their reign (Hitler was the only leader in the world who achieved a 100% employment stat), as opposed to George Bush leading the US economy's record surplus to a record deficit, tsk tsk tsk...
But back on topic... I don't think killing Saddam will achieve anything, other than further destabilise the already fragile situation between the Iraqi Sunni and Shi'ite population, paving the way for much more bloodshed. Supporters of Saddam will initiate immediate and massive retaliation, so... do the math. Is it really worth killing him? It's not like he can do anything anymore anyway. If he's not in a position of power, then what threat is he?
It has already been proven he has no ties to any terrorist group, and that his regime posed no threat at all to the US or any other countries. So the invasion and occupation was all for... zilch.
100,000 dead Iraqi civillians later, a good portion of the country in uninhabitable ruins, 70%+ unemployment, rapidly growing groups of insurgents, and crying mothers mourning the murders of their children all take their hats off to George Bush's invasion, freeing them from the "cruel hands of the tyrant". Please don't tell me you guys really think it was worth all the bloodshed?
I know I'm setting myself up for a flaming up the whazoo but do actually read everything of what I've written up instead of seeing a couple of words and assuming I support his actions before writing back.
there is a lot of evidence. everyone knows he massacred and raped his own pple.Sam_Harris said:I don't think he killed them all just order there death not that it makes it any better
yeh, but its not like Iraq can or are gonna put their president to a death sentence. he would have killed themArcadium said:Well, i actually don't understandd how a country like USA, can put someone to death, that doesn't have anything to be with them... do you know what I mean?
Arcadium said:Well, i actually don't understandd how a country like USA, can put someone to death, that doesn't have anything to be with them... do you know what I mean?
lmao. its gonna be broadcasted live on TV. lol. seriously, are we back to the medieval times?Ronan said:Well actually, this is Iraq's justice (officially anyway) that is also why they hang and do not inject