Welcome to Our Community

Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.

Battalion Wars 2 online: Fun, but shallow.

Discussion in 'Nintendo Wii Gaming' started by Atomheart, Feb 6, 2008.

  1. Atomheart

    Atomheart M'bating to Z Suit Samus

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    617
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    WI
    I COMPLETELY agree with Gamespot's and other reviewers sentiments that online is shallow; though, that's not to say it isn't fun (it's very fun). But as a strategy game, it is extremely shallow, particularly the skirmish mode. In fact, the game is very strategy lite overall (campaign and online). Anyone who has played a strategy game or even Advanced Wars before knows what I'm talking about. Without an economy, base building, or unit production (and control over it), the strategies that you can employ are very limited as you and your enemy will always be evenly matched and will always have the same deployment of units. Then what it all boils down to is who has the fastest shot and who can move units around the fastest--not who can strategize the best.

    Here's what could have made the game infinitely deeper and what they should strive for in BWiii:

    -Economy. This could be as simple as it is in Advance Wars: capturing cities to increase funds over time. Or they could take it a step further and include actual resource harvesting and whatnot. However, there needs to be at least the basic AW style economy.

    -Unit production. The game needs the capability to actually produce units in the factories and such, and you need to have control over that production. So rather than just having units respawn when yours die, the game needs to give the player to produce whichever units they want, which would be tied into the economy.

    -Different victory terms in skirmish mode. Rather than racking up points to a timer, the games should play out more like AW and traditional strategy games in which you have to either eliminate the enemy's force or capture their HQ. This would obviously require big maps.


    Optional

    Base building. The ability to use funds to build your own base (e.g., factories, barracks, etc.) would add exponentially to the game. Also, the enemy would then have the goal of destroying the other base as well. However, this isn't totally necessary. Pre-deployed buildings that can be strategically captured works fine as well.

    Unit upgrades. Also tied into the economy would be unit upgrades at research facilities. Here you would not only unlock higher level units, but you would also upgrade the firepower, armor, etc. of your units. Again, this is not necessary but would add a lot of depth.
     
  2. cyberzomby

    cyberzomby OH NOES! A PICTURE

    Joined:
    May 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,102
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Wii Friend Code: 4855-3513-2198-8739
    4855-3513-2198-8739
    Well people like you made it in to a Strategy game while it in fact is a 3rd person action game with some unit control.

    It never was a RTS in the first place.

    I do agree with you on your points ( altough not the optional ones ) but A LOT of people keep saying: BWii SUCKS AS A STRATEGY GAME! While itsnt even an RTS game Just watch some video's on youtube and you know its not even coming close to strategy
     
  3. Atomheart

    Atomheart M'bating to Z Suit Samus

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    617
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    WI
    Actually, it IS billed as a strategy game, even by the developer.
     
  4. cyberzomby

    cyberzomby OH NOES! A PICTURE

    Joined:
    May 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,102
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Wii Friend Code: 4855-3513-2198-8739
    4855-3513-2198-8739
    oh lol! Well that takes down my "valid"point and makes it a personal view ;)
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

battalion wars 2 online

,

battallion wars 2 online down