High Def Redsteel pix

Wilko21

Wii-kipedia
Sep 17, 2006
118
0
Perth, WA
On IGN i realised that there are high res pictures of RedSteel. If the game only supports up to 480p are these just developement photos from Nintendo?

red-steel-20060928055012400.jpg

red-steel-20061010022521038.jpg

red-steel-20061016093537668.jpg
 
wow! not bad at all..i read somewhere that the wii was about the same graphics as the gamecube..is this true? GC had 480p??
 
COLDshiver said:
No, the Wii is roughly 1.5 times faster than the GC


Gamecube = 485MHz custom CPU with 162MHz custom graphics processor

Wii = CPU IBM Broadway 729MHz with an ATI GPU clocked at 243mhz.

Xbox = CPU 733 MHz chip crafted by Intel, 250MHz custom chip

Wii = Xbox
 
Last edited:
You mean less....by 4 MHZ
So the Wii graphics are worse than the last gen's ?
:(
 
wiicanchangetheworld said:
You mean less....by 4 MHZ
So the Wii graphics are worse than the last gen's ?
:(


4mhz doenst make any difference. THe graphics are pretty much the same as what the Xbox offers. To be honest the Wii is actually more powerfull than the Xbox but the numbers fool you. The chips on the Wii are more powerfull but are clocked a little lower. It doesnt make the Wii worse than the Xbox because it really is faster and more powerfull.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #7
Just because the Wii has similar MHZ numbers as the Xbox doesn't mean it cant be more powerful. There are other things to consider.
 
Lethal said:
Gamecube = 485MHz custom CPU with 162MHz custom graphics processor

Wii = CPU IBM Broadway 729MHz with an ATI GPU clocked at 243mhz.

Xbox = CPU 733 MHz chip crafted by Intel, 250MHz custom chip

Wii = Xbox


Wii has more power than xbox, Power PC has different architecture than intel, it performs better...
 
Back
Top