Insomniacs assemble!!
- Thread starter DBloke
- Start date
RockerJ
Still Obsessed with P4
>implying Injustice is like Street Fighter
Speaking of, picked it and King of Fighters XIII up today. Can't say I really care for the second one.
RockerJ
Still Obsessed with P4
Not quite. Injustice has L, M, H, and Trait.
Street Fighter has LP, MP, HP, LK, MK, HK
This alone makes the game feel entirely different.
Still your grasp over the mechanics still granted you victory
WiiAssasin
The ride never ends
Been working on an essay. Or at least trying. It's not working. Can't think of anything.
WiiAssasin
The ride never ends
Guns! Shootings! Politics! Lots of coverage, but not a lick of established facts! The facts we do have are just pointing sporadically.
WiiAssasin
The ride never ends
Whichever side avoids death. Except both do and don't. It's crazy stuff.
Guns potentially saves freedom and protect us from oppression and harm.
Lack of guns potentially saves lives.
However guns aren't the only things that kill. I would say it is a persons intent to kill that endangers people and not guns themselves. Cars are arguably a more dangerous weapon yet it gives us freedom.
It's about finding the proper balance. A lack of guns could be more dangerous then what we have right now. A good argument to that is, if guns are outlawed then only the outlaws will have guns. Yet guns provide an easy and quick way for someone with an intent to murder to actually murder (even if it means murdering themselves).
Personally, I believe guns are a right and private property. Touching that on a national level and not at the state level is going to far in my opinion.
Lack of guns potentially saves lives.
However guns aren't the only things that kill. I would say it is a persons intent to kill that endangers people and not guns themselves. Cars are arguably a more dangerous weapon yet it gives us freedom.
It's about finding the proper balance. A lack of guns could be more dangerous then what we have right now. A good argument to that is, if guns are outlawed then only the outlaws will have guns. Yet guns provide an easy and quick way for someone with an intent to murder to actually murder (even if it means murdering themselves).
Personally, I believe guns are a right and private property. Touching that on a national level and not at the state level is going to far in my opinion.
WiiAssasin
The ride never ends
But it's a federally granted right.
Not exactly
It all depends on how you interpret it.
It does not say that gun control is prohibited
It was made with the idea of a militia (that no longer exists) in mind.
Arms means weapons and not necessarily mean guns.
All have been discussed and debated.
There are many arguments to get by the Second Amendment that any lawyer would implement.
Also, a politician get away with doing something unconstitutional. Obama has managed to do it.
It all depends on how you interpret it.
It does not say that gun control is prohibited
It was made with the idea of a militia (that no longer exists) in mind.
Arms means weapons and not necessarily mean guns.
All have been discussed and debated.
There are many arguments to get by the Second Amendment that any lawyer would implement.
Also, a politician get away with doing something unconstitutional. Obama has managed to do it.
