WiiAssasin
The ride never ends
If it was based on sex, then you can hardly call it a proper relationship.
help skyward sword win game of the year at G4tv
- Thread starter averagegam
- Start date
Splash_King
The Scrubbiest of Hunters
Noone said anything about proper or serious relationships. :lol: Of course a proper relationship isn't based on anything but the relationshipees.
Relationshipees isn't a word... Damn!
Relationshipees isn't a word... Damn!
WiiAssasin
The ride never ends
The term "girlfriend" implies a romantic relationship with a female. Ergo, that relationship must be more than just sex.
No. You forget, as most do, that any "romantic" relationship, no matter how complex or basic is entirely based on sex. That is the reason we exist! To reproduce. Not to get into the whole meaning of life crap but pretty much anything and everything we do is based on sex- or the potential for sex, no matter how insignificant or imaginary... :sick:
Romantic relationships are pretty ridiculous in our era tho. and most forget, its really all about sex, anything else positive is just a bonus. Love=sex Dont "try" to deny it... It really is that black & white bro.
WiiAssasin
The ride never ends
By your flawed logic, romantic relationships without sex cannot possibly exist.
So... Your just going to deny (very) basic biology?OK. Name some of these scenarios. I can name a few... Old couples - but they did have sex. Abstinent pre-married, but these people will have sex eventually. Uhmmm hopefully were only talking two "normal" heterosexual people with average sex drive. Cause with you, everything has to be categorized & defined to a t...
WiiAssasin
The ride never ends
This is concerning whether "love=sex", which is bull. Biology and reproduction are irrelevant!
Here are a couple of scenarios you requested: During the 19th century, certain religious groups prohibited sex of all kinds, even if they were married. Modern case: Someone with AIDS being romantically involved with a healthy individual.
Here are a couple of scenarios you requested: During the 19th century, certain religious groups prohibited sex of all kinds, even if they were married. Modern case: Someone with AIDS being romantically involved with a healthy individual.
Splash_King
The Scrubbiest of Hunters
... Wait, really? That's how people use girlfriend nowadays?
EDIT: WORK DAMN YOU, PHOTOBUCKET!
Thats OK you guys are youngins. Well IDK how old Assassin is...
Did you know almost all human physical contact causes your brain to release euphoric chemicals? The same applies to the one performing the act. Even stupid **** like petting your dog or cat, and even your dog or cat's brain reacts in a similar way. A sort of weird symbiosis. Both like performing and receiving. Ever wonder why it feels so damn good to have your back scratched?...
The act of sex and orgasm and all the combined touching, kissing, eye contact EVERYTHING is all a chemical response. With sex its multiplied enormously. Your desire to have sex comes from one simple biological necessity- To ****ing Reproduce! So saying its irrelevant is like saying the sun is irrelevant to life. Without sex life could not exist. Without sex our species would fail. Without sex YOU WOULD NOT EXIST! No offense...
I say this again, almost everything you do in life after pubescence is because of sex. Your "love" is all chemicals. Its not real "thing". The reason you love is to have sex. And once sex is performed, because of these reactions in your brain your "love" becomes addiction to these chemicals... Herp.
"During the 19th century, certain religious groups prohibited sex of all kinds, even if they were married."
Yep, all whilst the pastor was ****ing 10 year old boys behind the pulpit...
"Modern case: Someone with AIDS being romantically involved with a healthy individual."
See above. They still probably perform all the same **** minus actual intercourse. You can call this a IDK humans are ****ing weird anomaly. Even if reproduction is restricted we still use sex and relationships purely for gratification. Just like porn...
</wall-of-text>
Did you know almost all human physical contact causes your brain to release euphoric chemicals? The same applies to the one performing the act. Even stupid **** like petting your dog or cat, and even your dog or cat's brain reacts in a similar way. A sort of weird symbiosis. Both like performing and receiving. Ever wonder why it feels so damn good to have your back scratched?...
The act of sex and orgasm and all the combined touching, kissing, eye contact EVERYTHING is all a chemical response. With sex its multiplied enormously. Your desire to have sex comes from one simple biological necessity- To ****ing Reproduce! So saying its irrelevant is like saying the sun is irrelevant to life. Without sex life could not exist. Without sex our species would fail. Without sex YOU WOULD NOT EXIST! No offense...
I say this again, almost everything you do in life after pubescence is because of sex. Your "love" is all chemicals. Its not real "thing". The reason you love is to have sex. And once sex is performed, because of these reactions in your brain your "love" becomes addiction to these chemicals... Herp.
"During the 19th century, certain religious groups prohibited sex of all kinds, even if they were married."
Yep, all whilst the pastor was ****ing 10 year old boys behind the pulpit...
"Modern case: Someone with AIDS being romantically involved with a healthy individual."
See above. They still probably perform all the same **** minus actual intercourse. You can call this a IDK humans are ****ing weird anomaly. Even if reproduction is restricted we still use sex and relationships purely for gratification. Just like porn...
</wall-of-text>
WiiAssasin
The ride never ends
We now have the technology to make babies in test tubes.... No sex necessary.
So no, sex is not necessary in a relationship.
I see the root of the problem now. Look up the definition of "sex" and "love".trollface said:
skidmarx
semi-pro thumb jockey
lol topic derailment :lol:
some folks get married at 87 just to have someone to play cards with :wink:
some folks get married at 87 just to have someone to play cards with :wink:
Nope, the root of the problem was starting this particular discussion with you...:sick: ...
Splash_King
The Scrubbiest of Hunters
I have known all of this for years. Point? :lol:
We are capable of love for the purpose of reproduction; that doesn't mean that's all that's there. I'm not saying love can't be explained by science, but I'm sure as **** saying our sentience plays a role just as much, if not more, than sex.
SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Haha This thread never really went anywhere anyway... /dead
Well, Im done with this discussion... Guess I was just grumpy. BTW Just in case, if anyone at any point in your life ever asks you to put an online finance application on their website... Tell em to FOaD! There's like 1-bagillion fields and literally 7 pages involved + about 10 hours work...For one GD form!!! And it all has to be SSL! Man I really low-balled this **** too...
</rant>
Sorry Assassin
Well, Im done with this discussion... Guess I was just grumpy. BTW Just in case, if anyone at any point in your life ever asks you to put an online finance application on their website... Tell em to FOaD! There's like 1-bagillion fields and literally 7 pages involved + about 10 hours work...For one GD form!!! And it all has to be SSL! Man I really low-balled this **** too...
</rant>
Sorry Assassin
WiiAssasin
The ride never ends
It's fine. I hadn't had a decent discussion since the month began. I was starting to get rusty.
