i liked vice city a lot, but san andreas was my favourite. When i had my ps2 and i started opening up my gaming interest i slowly lost the feel for GTA games. Cause everyone knows in the end once u beat it the game just sits their and collects dust. Sure its fun to walk around and shoot up everything in site and be a badass but how long does that last?. I may be completely wrong since i have no idea on gameplay but from my first impressions the game just looks like an enhanced GTA3 with obviously way better graphics. Although im sure it will be pretty fun like the rest, but nothing to get over excited about IMO.
I'm definitely going to get this game for the XBox 360. Finally a GTA with a map based off NYC. My only complain is that they did not include all of NYC in the map (Bronx, Harlem etc.). Besides that, looks like a fantastic game.
All GTA's released on PS2 all scored in the 90s at metacritic/gamerankings. Rockstar is one of those developers that do not screw up their GTA franchise. Im sure this game will also land in the 90s, could be one of the best games ever made, but we will see. VC was my favorite simply because of the story and how the city felt. It really sucked you into the feel of living in miami during pablo escobar influence on drugs in not only miami but all of america. Even though pablo isnt mentioned in VC or any real people from real life, it was during that time
ye id have to agree with your comment about VC there tek. For me VC just had a better feel to playing it and made me feel a bit more relaxed and willing to explore the city, maybe its just cuz i love the 80s. For me VC had the balance of easy, medium and hard missions, combined with a nice city, plenty to do at all times and the music could never be topped. I just loved VC full stop. Having said that, SA was still a great game.