Beckham off the mark for AC Milan

ProShooter

WiiChat Member
Aug 8, 2007
1,055
6
On loan from the Los Angeles Galaxy for three months, the England midfielder scored Milan's fourth goal, finishing off a slick move with a powerful shot.

Brazil's Kaka, who rejected a world record move to Manchester City last week, scored twice - a penalty and a shot from the edge of the box.

Milan's other goal was scored by veteran Dutchman Clarence Seedorf.

Milan got off to the worst possible start when Serie A top scorer Marco Di Vaio scored a ninth-minute penalty but Carlo Ancelotti's side soon drew level when Seedorf slid the ball home after Kaka's effort was parried.

Kaka then took control of the game, netting with a penalty and a superb left-foot shot, before Beckham wrapped up Milan's win.

"To score my first goal is great and I will keep this shirt, but the important thing is we won here," said Beckham, who is due to return to LA Galaxy on 9 March.

"I can't say what will happen," added Beckham, responding to growing speculation he might stay in Italy. "Even if my contract says that I'll be here until March. We'll have to see."


Milan coach Carlo Ancelotti added: "Our hands are tied because he has a clear contract.


"We can't do anything to change things, he can definitely do something. He must sort out his contract with the American team. I'm a realist - we'll take advantage of him for now."

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/europe/7850103.stm

Beckham was offered about 250 million dollars for a 5 year contract with LA Galaxy (correct me if I'm wrong). So if I'm not wrong he would be turning down all that money?

I'd love to see Beckham play for AC milan personally just because I like to watch Beckham play, and I certainly don't like American soccer. What do you guys think?

He scored 2 goals for AC milan so far, one being a free kick.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #3
Yeah but hes thinking of rejecting them. But that's probably because hes stinking rich. He's not that good of a soccer/football player. As a midfielder, all he does is punt the ball. But he is good at free kicks. Not saying he's bad, but why isn't he a striker? He doesn't help back much either.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #5
Gosh, how much I wish I'd live in England. All you see out here is a bunch of hockey players.
 
Beckhams a poser that has yet to do a decent days work
I hope he suffers some kind of ball in face related ingury
 
Yeah but hes thinking of rejecting them. But that's probably because hes stinking rich. He's not that good of a soccer/football player. As a midfielder, all he does is punt the ball. But he is good at free kicks. Not saying he's bad, but why isn't he a striker? He doesn't help back much either.

Lmfao, sorry fella but...oh dear.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #10
All I tell you is what I see. And you know all he does is punt the ball
 
Please, for the love of God, stop saying 'punt'.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #13
Where we play soccer here, by punt we sometimes mean just blasting the ball, not necessarily a drop kick
 
Why
Is it cause it sounds to much like cu nt ?
Cause thats what he is

Lmao. Forgot you were subscribed to this. He's alright Becks, was good in his day. Now he just goes where his wench wants to shop.

Where we play soccer here, by punt we sometimes mean just blasting the ball, not necessarily a drop kick

'Punt' is not a footballing term. It is not acceptable. By 'blasting the ball', do you just mean a long ball?
 
Back
Top