Earthworm Jim
wormus maximus
ottoman said:Funny how america stel Iraq's OIL, then raise their gas prices :lol:
first off its not america stealing oil! its Bush and the oil companies, one of which is your precious british petroleum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ottoman said:Funny how america stel Iraq's OIL, then raise their gas prices :lol:
MysticGohan said:Don't pump gas on MAY 15th
In April 1997, there was a "gas out" conducted nationwide in protest of gas prices. Gasoline prices dropped 30 cents a gallon overnight.
On May 15th 2007, all internet users are to not go to a gas station in protest of high gas prices. Gas is now over $3.00 a gallon in most places.
There are 73,000,000+ American members currently on the internet network, and the average car takes about 30 to 50 dollars to fill up.
If al l users did not go to the pump on the 15th, it would take $2,292,000, 000.00 (that's almost 3 BILLION) out of the oil companies pockets for just one day, so please do not
go to the gas station on May 15th and lets try to put a dent in the Middle Eastern oil industry for at least one day.
If you agree (which I cant see why you wouldn't) resend this to all your contact list. With it saying, ''Don't pump gas on May 15th"
SPREAD THE WORD!
Brawny said:yeah, I hate hydrogen people. Don't understand that all the hydrogen is made from fossil fuels...
Gaz said:or er maybe you got some more oil from the war in iraq.
Skippy said:You can get hydrogen from water, it's not hard to do.
Skippy said:Gas is way higher now than it was before the war started.
really? in the uk it was over £1 a litre during thway, after the war back down to 92.9p in most areasSkippy said:Gas is way higher now than it was before the war started.
oh reallyBrawny said:he meant it as sarcasm.
nawwwwwh thats rubbish, oil companies such as BP are putting more money into finding new sources than money spent on fossel fuils. why would they want to prolong new technologies and fuels, if they don't progress with the world they will go bust, it is common sense.Griever said:the only problem is that the Oil Companies have such a monopoly over fuel that they do everything they can to restrict the use of such technology.
Griever said:We pay more for everything - and we still have more money than the U.S.
Go figure ;o
Brawny said:Even though you quoted, using the extra 10 seconds to put them all in one post would be much appreciated by all.
You clearly don't know what a communist is. If I was a communist I would be insulting you for being a capitalist but I'm not; what I am actually doing is saying you should use less carbon-based fuels. The difference between the two is so staggering that I'm surprised even someone of your (obviously) limited brain capacity can't comprehend it. Clearly, though, you lack the brain cells to comprehend the difference.First of all, Griever. You are a ****-head little communist.
I think effort should be put into encouraging people to drive more ecologically friendly vehicles or, on the other hand, effort should be put into making the same vehicle more ecologically friendly by developing more eco-friendly fuels.You think effort should be put into stopping what other people drive?
First of all, England is a capitalist country, so you can shove your propaganda bullshit up your arse.We run according to supply and demand. Im sure you wouldnt understand, but in my country, people start their own business and do big things with their lives. An SUV seems like a necesary tool in the construction, landscaping, remodeling business, which are all a big part of my Florida economy.
Not quite true, although it is very possible to bend statistics. I believe bending statistics is what you did for the whole paragraph after this sentence. Congratulations on being able to criticise AND do the same thing within the same paragraph, though. Most politicians at least wait a couple of interviews before contradicting themselves.2nd, you can make a statistic say anything you want.
The easy response would be this - "No, it's a picture of me after having kicked your Dad's arse because he walked in on me rainbow kissing your mother. Oh. No. He. Didn't."3rd, is your AVI a pic of you just having busted your dads cherry?
Again, the easy response would be - "I'm not gay, ask your mum LOLOLOL."4th, Its not your fault you are gay.
And if you don't believe me just ask Mr. Maddox. Hell, this article would probably help you too!Maddox AKA God said:You do have a point though: writing code all day is much more homoerotic than patting your jock buddies on the ass after a sweaty game of catch, then winding down with a nice, steamy, group shower. Maybe if you weren't such a sexually insecure dumbass, you'd have spent the time you pissed away playing highschool sports--you know, that thing nobody in the real world cares about--learning how to read instead so that you don't end up bagging my groceries
So England has "more money" than the U.S.......huh, I wasnt aware of that. Instead of running my mouth about how much I know that is bullshit, why dont you prove it to me? give me a source of reference please.