Why do you guys hate so much
- Thread starter Sovieto
- Start date
- Status
kissoff182
Comp Sci's Smurfette
LOL a large # of the games that are made for PS3 are also made for PCs. PCs can do anything that PS3 can do + more.
kissoff182
Comp Sci's Smurfette
El Jefe said:
*takes a bow*
hmmm I don't see why everyone hates the PS3 so much, the price can be a factor but thats about it. So everyone was talking about games, well I don't see any good games out for the Wii other then zelda, the rest of them suck. If the Wii is so good and everything why can't they make a half decent game with this new technology of gameplay, as far as I'm seeing theres only gonna be a couple good games come out in the next few months. I have a Wii myself and now that i beat zelda there is nothing left to do on it, if the wii had online play (especially for Wii sports) then it would make the system a lot more fun. I don't hate the Wii, I just think the PS3 is better.
Wii&Ps3 said:
Your original argument against me was that blue ray discs were coming close to being fully utilized and now you are saying they have barely scratched the surface of it's limits. So, which is it?
A 15 Gigabyte game doesn't need to be blue ray, and if a game comes close to that it's mostly cinematic content and not actual game play.
Yeah it would be really smart for sony to have every single game they produce on more than one disk :lol: Think about it. Maybe a few games is fine, but most of sonys launch games will not fit on a dvd. Those are just launch games! Your arguement is stupid. Until you come up with something good, stop replying.
Spiderking13
WiiChat Member
- Dec 21, 2006
- 77
- 0
Wii&Ps3 said:
What do you mean his argument is stupid. He has trumped you on every post, you can't even stay arguing on the same topic for more than two posts. you keep switching what your arguing on whenever he comes up with something better, smarter, and something that is actually right. your argument is stupid my friend, very very stupid.
I think people are forgetting it costs time and money to fill up a 15gb DVD/BR. When the Sega DC launched, most games did not fill up the 1gb CD. This has been a fact for all games on all systems. Only 5%-15% of games actually fill up the capacity. Do you have any idea how much content you'd have to put into a 200gb game? I'm assuming you also want quality content? The only games I can see getting past 50gb are FF13, and Xeno Saga.
kissoff182
Comp Sci's Smurfette
imae said:um single layer 25gb... so quad 4 layer = 200gb??ut:
it's pretty simple math right? care to explain?
haha pwn3d.
VampiricLugia
Guillotine Fodder
imae said:um single layer 25gb... so quad 4 layer = 200gb??
it's pretty simple math right? care to explain?
Dude....you really need to go back to second grade....Your math is..well..WRONG
VampiricLugia
Guillotine Fodder
imae said:
Ahhhh....Too many pages to read through on this. Get so accustomed to seeing people posting some ridiculous math crap and it's funny to get a reaction....but since you were making fun of the guy, sorry.
re
I see you talking, but all i hear is nonsense. I have not been trumped. He says no games will go over 15gb, but there will be plenty.
I was reading about the quad layer disks when I read sony is looking into 200gb disks. For some reason I though the disks were 50gb :lol:
Spiderking13 said:
I see you talking, but all i hear is nonsense. I have not been trumped. He says no games will go over 15gb, but there will be plenty.
I was reading about the quad layer disks when I read sony is looking into 200gb disks. For some reason I though the disks were 50gb :lol:
- Status
Similar threads
